but this is the 7th Anniversary, not the 8th.

Just like WM25 was actually the 24th Anniversary.

MTM wrote:

Just like WM25 was actually the 24th Anniversary.

First off fuck boy, don't get sarcastic when you don't know shit.

Second, RTR is always 1 year ahead of the year of the Anniversary due to the fact that the first Road to Redemption took place in AWF.

I'm right.

Well, this got serious real quick

. wrote:

MTM wrote:

Just like WM25 was actually the 24th Anniversary.

First off fuck boy, don't get sarcastic when you don't know shit.

Second, RTR is always 1 year ahead of the year of the Anniversary due to the fact that the first Road to Redemption took place in AWF.

I'm right.

What did Aaron say to contradict what you said, though?

. wrote:

MTM wrote:

Just like WM25 was actually the 24th Anniversary.

First off fuck boy, don't get sarcastic when you don't know shit.

Second, RTR is always 1 year ahead of the year of the Anniversary due to the fact that the first Road to Redemption took place in AWF.

I'm right.

I wasn't being sarcastic. 

It's the 7th Road To Redemption in EAW - yes... but the one in AWF was an EAW-brand exclusive, I believe. So... might as well. The 8-year thing is more so for EAW's 2nd inception coming in late December anyway, rather than RTR itself.

It's celebrating EAW coming into 2015, which is its 8th year 

/ thread

aka we're lazy and don't feel like changing shit.

Lannister wrote:

It's the 7th Road To Redemption in EAW - yes... but the one in AWF was an EAW-brand exclusive, I believe. So... might as well. The 8-year thing is more so for EAW's 2nd inception coming in late December anyway, rather than RTR itself.

It's always been whatever RTR number it was, the Anniversary year was behind one year.

This is the 8th RTR overall.

So it's the 7th Anniversary.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8??

. wrote:

aka we're lazy and don't feel like changing shit.

aka we're celebrating the 8th anniversary on RTR 8 so that we're not celebrating an 8th year anniversary on RTR 9. Imagine how uggs that'd look.

. wrote:

Lannister wrote:

It's the 7th Road To Redemption in EAW - yes... but the one in AWF was an EAW-brand exclusive, I believe. So... might as well. The 8-year thing is more so for EAW's 2nd inception coming in late December anyway, rather than RTR itself.

It's always been whatever RTR number it was, the Anniversary year was behind one year.

This is the 8th RTR overall.

So it's the 7th Anniversary.

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8??

8th year of EAW being celebrated at RTR. Pretty simple concept to understand. Just need some logic on your end, is all.

whyyyyy

How is it logical to go against logic? No one once complained about the way we used to do it because it was RIGHT. Now we're just going to abandon that logic because "it doesn't look pretty".

You don't celebrate your 10th wedding Anniversary before you even get there.

You don't celebrate your Senior Year of High School when you're a Junior.

If you want to celebrate EAW going into it's 8th year, then cool... But don't call it an Anniversary show when you're wrong on the year.

You aint gonna throw hands with me though so keep poppin off. You might find me in the cut up in Long Island with a glock 12 between my buttcheeks. 

People thinkin they can get real verbal round me but I'll crack ya jaw.

. wrote:

If you want to celebrate EAW going into it's 8th year, then cool... But don't call it an Anniversary show when you're wrong on the year.

WWE did it, but I agree.

I don't know how you can say it's "always" been anything Scott, since you wouldn't have been around for at least like the three first rtrs and maybe the fourth. Though I see the logic behind what you are saying, and I'm normally a stickler about things like that just as you are being now, but this RTR thing might as well be one of those things we don't bother changing like the promo"z" page and if WWE and wrestling companies are known to do it more power to us to get away with it. It's no big deal and sounds better.

ERASE LOGIC BECAUSE IT SOUNDS BETTER.

k

k.

k...

^ racist

you're fired

I agree with Scott.