John Cena - 96
Shawn Michaels - 95
Daniel Bryan - 94
Undertaker - 93
Sheamus - 93
Brock Lesnar - 92
Chris Jericho 2002 - 92
CM Punk 2011 - 92
CM Punk - 91
Rick Flair - 91
The Rock - 91
Triple H - 91
Kane - 91
Ultimate Warrior - 90
Daniel Bryan 2012 - 90
Stone Cold - 90
Randy Orton - 90
Bray Wyatt - 89
Roman Reigns - 89
Seth Rollins - 89
Ultimate Warrior - 89
Batista 2003 - 89
Batista - 88
Dean Ambrose - 88
Kane 2002 - 88
Chris Jericho - 88
Alberto Del Rio - 88
Alberto Del Rio 2011 - 87
Adrian Neville - 87
Kevin Nash - 87
Big Show - 87
Cesaro - 86
Randy Orton 2004 - 86
Sami Zayn - 86
Luke Harper - 86
RVD - 86
Cody Rhodes - 85
Booker T - 85
Jey Uso - 85
Jimmy Uso - 85
Goldust - 85
Jack Swagger - 85
Dolph Ziggler - 84
Mark Henry - 84
Erick Rowan - 84
R-Truth - 84
Rusev - 84
Kofi Kingston - 84
Bad News Barrett - 84
The Miz - 84
Rey Mysterio - 84
Big E - 84
Tyson Kidd - 84
Ryback - 84
Damien Sandow - 83
Titus O'Neil - 83
Bo Dallas - 83
Xavier Woods - 83
Darren Young - 81
Curtis Axel - 81
Justin Gabriel - 81
Santino Marella - 80
Fandango - 80
Corey Graves - 79

Brie Bella - 83
Nikki Bella - 83
Natalya - 82
AJ Lee - 82
Tamina - 81
Naomi - 76
Cameron - 75
Summer Rae - 73

How the fuck is Sheamus a 93?!

Cena 96
Lesnar 92

this is a travesty!

i buy the season pass just to fix these ratings

I don't believe these ratings, they'd never do this to Austin and the Rock, after Hogan they're the biggest wwe names of all time.

Komodo Dragon wrote:

I don't believe these ratings, they'd never do this to Austin and the Rock, after Hogan they're the biggest wwe names of all time.

These are legit. ItsMyYard and Wezi confirmed all of these from the MyCareer they played last week.

Should we all be really surprised?

Screw Rock and Austin, just look at Booker T and RVD!

I don't get why 96 is the highest. They should give Rock and Austin 99s.

LMFAO STONE COLD A 90 ARE YOU FUCKING JOKING

No one's ever been a 99, but these ratings are pretty ridiculous.

There ratings get stupider every game.

The real disappointment is the actual roster. Including DLC for both games, 2K15 has 82 roster spots while 2K14 has 110. When you take in to consideration that 2K14 had 56 alternate attires, which also take up spots, the roster is a sizeable 166. 2K15 only just manages 110 including alternate attires.

Smh at all of this

SMH

MTM wrote:

The real disappointment is the actual roster. Including DLC for both games, 2K15 has 82 roster spots while 2K14 has 110. When you take in to consideration that 2K14 had 56 alternate attires, which also take up spots, the roster is a sizeable 166. 2K15 only just manages 110 including alternate attires.

Have you looked at the actual WWE roster page. If it wasn't for legends and such there would only be like 60 total people in the whole game

Kaol Wake wrote:

MTM wrote:

The real disappointment is the actual roster. Including DLC for both games, 2K15 has 82 roster spots while 2K14 has 110. When you take in to consideration that 2K14 had 56 alternate attires, which also take up spots, the roster is a sizeable 166. 2K15 only just manages 110 including alternate attires.

Have you looked at the actual WWE roster page. If it wasn't for legends and such there would only be like 60 total people in the whole game

True but Legends are needed in the game. It'd be like playing FIFA without there being a Classic XI team.