I'm excited (especially if the Chargers use the option to move along with the Rams).

I'm confused, as I haven't really looked too much into it, but if the Chargers moved also, would they be sharing the same arena?

If that's the case, there's no way in hell I would share an arena with another team. Idk, just my personal opinion.

The charger have the option to move into the new stadium with the Rams. And better them than the raiders like they were planing I think

Plus it mean that Wrestlemaina can come back to Los Angeles

Well guys, cue the "X to London" rumors

.

Tyler Parker wrote:

I'm a die-hard San Diego Chargers fan, I have been for my whole life and I HATE the possibility of them moving to Los Angeles. Earlier today, it seemed more like a certainty than a possibility but I've been hopeful and I'm hopeful that Dean Spanos will take the 100 mill and work with the city of San Diego in building a new stadium in the Mission Valley site. I just want them to stay. I may not live there but I've been there and I've been a life-long fan, so my loyalty is with San Diego. If they move, I'll watch football but not as a fan.

Really? Your gonna stop being a Chargers an if they move less than two hours away?

When LA lost the Raiders to Oakland (!) and the Rams to St. Louis (!!) in 1995, what was the difference between then and now to the point where the LA area is suddenly ready for two teams again?

20+ years will do that to a big market city. I'm neither a Chargers or Rams fan but just have a football team in the area is exciting. Throw in hosting a few Super Bowls, a couple of playoff worthy seasons, and a wrestlemainia and its sure to be a winning formula

.

The reason the Chargers could possibly be moving is such bullshit. I'd say good riddance if I were the city of San Diego. Good on them for holding out, and not wanting for the money of the tax payers of that city go into a stadium. Not to mention, a stadium that is owned by a billionaire and wouldn't put any money towards it.

But the Chargers will continue to hold that city hostage, in hope that they can get the tax payers to pay for their stadium. Just awful. Move on, if it pleases you, Chargers. You'll be second rate to the following that already is the LA Rams. Go be the Clippers. Go be the Mets. Be our guests.

It's all about $$$ to these assholes, league wide. Owners voted AGAINST the Rams being the sole team moving to LA. Meaning, it's going to be two no matter what essentially. I don't see the point. But they obviously haven't learned their lesson from the past.

As long as nothing happens to my Jets. I'm OK with it.
I just don't want LA to have two Football teams. Give them to places that don't have a rep. Like Vegas, the NHL wants to build a team there. I wouldn't mind the NFL having a team there.

Azumi Goto wrote:

As long as nothing happens to my Jets. I'm OK with it.
I just don't want LA to have two Football teams. Give them to places that don't have a rep. Like Vegas, the NHL wants to build a team there. I wouldn't mind the NFL having a team there.

I'm a huge NHL fan. That being said, I don't think that just because the NHL wants a team in Vegas, the NFL should follow. I'm especially bearish on the Vegas market because it's very unique, and not in a great way. For hockey, Vegas should have a decent number of season ticket holders, but you're going to have a lot of tourists who hijack the place and suddenly, home ice becomes a neutral venue. Think Anaheim Ducks playoff games, but worse.

There are several hockey arenas that look like that, but you don't want that for football. I'm pretty sure that this was a big reason why three NFL teams have applied for relocation in the first place.

(Not saying this won't be an issue in LA - it almost certainly will for a few years.)

Right now, my dad's probably just bitter the Raiders aren't coming back down here.

Considering LA hasn't had an NFL team the entire time I've been alive, I just wanna see how all this plays out. Having two teams didn't last forever the first time around, and I wonder what they plan to do different (if anything at all). Like Showster said, none of the teams involved are "my" team, but the prospect of LA having a team again is exciting. I just don't understand why they need two. Honestly, I'd rather LA just take the Rams and be done with it. It'd be nice to have the Chargers hash out all their problems with the city and the money, get a new stadium, and stay in San Diego.

The Browns should bid everyone out and move to LA.

ReddReaper wrote:

The Browns should bid everyone out and move to LA.

With what money?

The city should tax for it... Jimmy Haslam needs to open up that checkbook or sell the franchise..

Probably just sell it at this point. Unless they come up big this offseason.

Isn't too much coming up big in Cleveland... Especially after hiring Hue Jackson as your head coach...

In other news, Chargers are looking more into the move to LA now. Not sure how this is gonna work. Haven't looked too much more into it, so that's all I know right now.

Whooptie fucking doo. California gets ANOTHER football team. Stop the presses.

- guy from a state with 0 professional teams

^ We'll give you the Browns...

California isn't getting another team. They're just relocating a team that's already there to a different city. That's all.

Gotta give props to St. Louis' owner tho.. Nice move bud. You'll be very rich.

Jason Cage wrote:

In other news, Chargers are looking more into the move to LA now. Not sure how this is gonna work. Haven't looked too much more into it, so that's all I know right now.

well the rams are going to play in a temp facility untill the new stadium is finished with construction, so I imagine that the Chargers would probably do the same.