Prove me otherwise  

He should be briefcase holder too  

Moonlight Predator wrote:

He should be briefcase holder too  

Imagine Rollins cashing in on Dean  

The heat 

Neither of them should beat Brock, its just not believable. Ambrose just hasn't been built up enough--even Daniel Bryan might not be ready to win by 31. Reigns unfortunately is the most believable guy by the way he's been pushed, but maybe Reigns can improve in where he severely lacks.

I think Reigns will beat Lesnar and then Seth Rollins will cash in on Reigns.

Bryan is the only correct answer.

Dark Demon wrote:

Bryan is the only correct answer.

Bryan is the only correct answer for the question, "Who WON'T Brock Lesnar face at WrestleMania 31".

On Strike wrote:

Dark Demon wrote:

Bryan is the only correct answer.

Bryan is the only correct answer for the question, "Who WON'T Brock Lesnar face at WrestleMania 31".

EL TORITO STILL HAS A CHANCE TO BEAT LESNAR AT WM31!      

Dark Demon wrote:

Bryan is the only correct answer.

Bryan can very well face him, but would it be believable if he beat Lesnar when Taker and Cena lost to him? Reigns is believable, but I don't want him to be the one to beat the one simply because he isn't a very good wrestler (has a few explosive moves, but he still has to improve through and through) and also he is not a good promoer. Ambrose just has the "it factor" and there's something about his character that I can see clash against Lesnar.

If it were up to me, though, I'd have Brock Lesnar completely dominate the WWE for over a year and not have anyone dethrone him until WM 32. That gives guys like Reigns time to build and become better overall pro-wrestlers, because let's be honest, he isn't ready and asking him to improve from now until WM that drastically is unfair.

Nobody can beat Lesnar. Simple as that. He is the last WWE Champion in the company's history. The End

How is it not believable Daniel Bryan could defeat Brock Lesnar? He beat John Cena clean, he beat Triple H, Randy Orton and Batista all clean in one night with an injured shoulder, its entirely possible that Bryan could defeat Lesnar in a one on one match and really, that's not only the biggest match that they could do at WM 31 since it's clear he won't face Rock for the title, but it's also the best match they could do and it'd certainly be one of, if not the, best match in history if it went down.

I think you guys are putting too much stock into the "believability factor." This is modern day WWE, where all of the talent have broken kayfabe on innumerable occasions and have gone out of their way to describe their profession as "entertainment." Hell, Daniel Bryan commented on the current affair angle with Brie saying, "it's fake, so okay." Do you guys honestly think John Cena would've beaten Lesnar in 2012 at Extreme Rules in real life? Or that CM Punk actually would've had a chance vs. Lesnar? If Punk can put on a respectable match with Lesnar, Bryan sure as hell can. After all, it's wrestling, and the objective isn't to depict what would happen in real life but what would entertain the fans the most. At the end of the day, that's what should take precedence and that's why Bryan should face Lesnar.

Also considering Lesnars outright destroyed huge men like Show and Henry ( one of whom's been billed as 'the strongest man in the world' for nearly a decade or longer) , along with manhandling Taker and Cena who are both big in their own right, I don't know how it's believable Reigns could seemingly stop Lesnar by this logic. 

It's not like Daniel Bryan is a jobber, he's not been booked like Santino or whatever, he's one of four guys to beat Cena clean in the last five years, I'm struggling to recall anybody since Wrestlemania 4 that has won two actual matches at Mania, whenever he's gotten a fair shot at anybody, he's won ( with the exception of Bray ) any other time he's been screwed by Triple H or Stephanie or Shawn or whatever, so idk how its not believable, this isn't UFC or whatever and they're having a shoot, it's wrestling.

Bryan is already a top guy regardless if he beats Lesnar or even faces him, so I think it has to be a young guy. My problem is that I don't think that "young guy" (which, if rumors serve true, is Reigns) will be ready for WM 31.

Bryan's a main eventer but this will only established him even further, his reign barely got off the ground and this will only further cement him, its not like he's been the guy in the company at one real point despite being the most over guy and he's also the most deserving out of everybody to beat Lesnar. 


Plus most importantly, Brock vs Bryan would rule so hard.

Dark Demon wrote:

Also considering Lesnars outright destroyed huge men like Show and Henry ( one of whom's been billed as 'the strongest man in the world' for nearly a decade or longer) , along with manhandling Taker and Cena who are both big in their own right, I don't know how it's believable Reigns could seemingly stop Lesnar by this logic. 

It's not like Daniel Bryan is a jobber, he's not been booked like Santino or whatever, he's one of four guys to beat Cena clean in the last five years, I'm struggling to recall anybody since Wrestlemania 4 that has won two actual matches at Mania, whenever he's gotten a fair shot at anybody, he's won ( with the exception of Bray ) any other time he's been screwed by Triple H or Stephanie or Shawn or whatever, so idk how its not believable, this isn't UFC or whatever and they're having a shoot, it's wrestling.

Santino was booked better than Bryan minus WrestleMania.

Alex Anderson wrote:

Bryan is already a top guy regardless if he beats Lesnar or even faces him, so I think it has to be a young guy. My problem is that I don't think that "young guy" (which, if rumors serve true, is Reigns) will be ready for WM 31.

Horrible

StarrStan wrote:

Alex Anderson wrote:

Bryan is already a top guy regardless if he beats Lesnar or even faces him, so I think it has to be a young guy. My problem is that I don't think that "young guy" (which, if rumors serve true, is Reigns) will be ready for WM 31.

Horrible

How? 

If anyone should beat Brock, it's Ryback and I'm not even kidding  

Black Tresus wrote:

If anyone should beat Brock, it's Ryback and I'm not even kidding  

Hulk Hogan BROTHER in his last match  

Just watch it be Sting. I would fucking die.
Not in the fan girl way.
Just. fucking. die.

Dean's soft ass finisher can't take out Lesnar. I love Ambrose though. You people don't understand the Roman movement. You people who scream for Dean Ambroses and Seths, just like Codys and Zigglers don't realize, their peaks are all CM Punks and Daniel Bryans. AKA number two spots. The reason people get behind Reigns is because we know he is the only cool talent WWE would let take the spot. He's our only hope of not dealing with Cena for the next ten thousand years.

Take some big guys, build them up at various speed, and let each of them take a shot at him with the last man (Roman Reigns) beating him at WM 31.

Black Tresus wrote:

If anyone should beat Brock, it's Ryback and I'm not even kidding  

Ryback needs to be pushed as a face again.

That would be great because I like them both, but I doubt it will happen...