I thought of something else no e-fed has other then unique championship divisions. Rankings. No one has rankings at all I don't know why but someone needs to start one for every championship.

Greg Ward wrote:

I thought of something else no e-fed has other then unique championship divisions. Rankings. No one has rankings at all I don't know why but someone needs to start one for every championship.

Greg Ward wrote:

I thought of something else no e-fed has other then unique championship divisions. Rankings. No one has rankings at all I don't know why but someone needs to start one for every championship.

Do you mean like WWE's Power 25, or like ROH's Top Six?

Cos a Top Six would be a killer idea. If you're in the mid or lower card, just getting to the Six will be storyline enough. 

Greg, you have ideas, dude! I like the cut of your J-I-B, brudda! 

kennydrake wrote:

Greg Ward wrote:

I thought of something else no e-fed has other then unique championship divisions. Rankings. No one has rankings at all I don't know why but someone needs to start one for every championship.

Do you mean like WWE's Power 25, or like ROH's Top Six?

Cos a Top Six would be a killer idea. If you're in the mid or lower card, just getting to the Six will be storyline enough. 

Greg, you have ideas, dude! I like the cut of your J-I-B, brudda! 

That's exactly what I mean.

Trios title would be cool.

Lucian Black wrote:

Trios title would be cool.

Yes it would. Jr. Heavyweight, Jr. Tag Team, Mixed Tag Team, and Trios Championship are all unique and no e-fed is doing that at all. Except FFP. They have a cruiserweight division and that's it.

Greg Ward wrote:

I thought of something else no e-fed has other then unique championship divisions. Rankings. No one has rankings at all I don't know why but someone needs to start one for every championship.

I've been in several efeds that had rankings for championships. For them to have any meaning at all, they'll need to be handled better (read: updated semi-regularly at all) here than they were in those past efeds. While I'm sure ownership here is more than capable of doing so, it may not (and in my opinion, shouldn't) be a high priority - especially now, as we're still going through delays on weekly shows.

If I were more familiar with things here, I'd consider writing a semi-regular column for Efed Zone as a pundit character I had a while ago. If somebody were to do that, it'd have the added bonus of being from an outside perspective, so there'd theoretically be no reason to complain about writer/owner biases. But, of course, it's time-consuming.

Lioncross wrote:

Greg Ward wrote:

I thought of something else no e-fed has other then unique championship divisions. Rankings. No one has rankings at all I don't know why but someone needs to start one for every championship.

I've been in several efeds that had rankings for championships. For them to have any meaning at all, they'll need to be handled better (read: updated semi-regularly at all) here than they were in those past efeds. While I'm sure ownership here is more than capable of doing so, it may not (and in my opinion, shouldn't) be a high priority - especially now, as we're still going through delays on weekly shows.

If I were more familiar with things here, I'd consider writing a semi-regular column for Efed Zone as a pundit character I had a while ago. If somebody were to do that, it'd have the added bonus of being from an outside perspective, so there'd theoretically be no reason to complain about writer/owner biases. But, of course, it's time-consuming.

I hear ya. You'll need some help with that. I would but I suck. All I can give is ideas. And I came up with great ones so far.

eh, we've enough titles as it is tbh

Agreed with Demon. I already think we have maybe 1 or 2 more titles than we already need, if you do not think that.. that is fine. However we should not be thinking about adding more titles regardless of how specific they may be. These are good ideas but definitely not something we will look into now, I feel it is more competitive with less than more in this case.

We don't need more titles but more competition in each title's division. Have a set number of people going after a title and have that title constantly defended, not constant 1 on 1 storylines for every title. I think we've been moving towards that with the size of our roster and we've had more multi-person matches.

Rankings are a terrible idea imo. Especially for the way EAW books people. There would be absolutely no point to them except to make people feel like shit when they inebitably get ranked lower than they should be.

EAW should try to avoid the boring systematic ideas if it wants to stay interesting. That also applies to all the tournaments which are starting to feel repetitive. The last thing we need is another tournament.

Maybe it's not titles or rankings we need but maybe a stronger world building aspect. There's many veterans with history with this company, but I can tell some of the newer people are finding hard to find their place. Maybe a brief history of the company in a non e-fed format, make it feel like a real thing. Like the Yahoo! Answers era could be explained as Yahoo investing in an idea that was pitched to them.

We do have 9 championships. 8 are single championship. 5 are minor championship. 3 of them goes to each show. If you have 3 shows you really only need 2 for each. 1 major, 1 minor. And with a growing roster its hard to keep track on who's the number one contender on each one. My ideas was based on math alone. With 56 Jr. Heavyweights a regular and tag division will a bit easy to figure out cause you might have a least half of them that want to be in it. That's 28. If you have 28 guys on this you might have 14 teams in the tag division. Plus a writer's mind can wild and gives the X Division feel to it. The Mixed Tag and Trios division is like watching Japanese Wrestling, everyone wins. New teams will form, everyone will work together, and you have a mixed team as the tag team champion already. This is just a idea I thought of a lot. So it's just a idea like the Rankings. There has to be a way to keep up with who's the number one of contender of what. Can't just guess. That's what rankings are for. Every job has it. As I said they're just Ideas. Are they great ideas? To me, yes cause of math and logic. To you, I don't know.